[The Montana Professor 20.1, Fall 2009 <http://mtprof.msun.edu>]

Appendix A.1

("Towards a comprehensive Quality Assurance System for degree programs in higher education," David Swanson.)

Form SECF-1 Student Evaluation of Instructor & Course

This form represents an opportunity for students to provide feedback on an instructor and a course. Summary information from these evaluations will be provided to the instructor and made available to students, staff, and others. However, individual forms will not be made available to the instructor or others beyond the (non-teaching) staff responsible for collecting forms. You may provide comments on the back.

(The instructor may not be present during the evaluation. The forms are distributed & collected only by staff.)

Instructor's Name_________________________ Course Title_____________________
Today's Date (day-month-year)_______________________

About the instructor & course
(Circle the applicable number)
Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor Unable to Answer/
Does Not Apply
The instructor's:
1. General organization of the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
2. Overall daily preparation for class was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
3. Explanation of student responsibilities and requirements was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
4. Explanation of learning objectives for the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
5. Ability to give clear presentations in class was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
6. Ability to express himself or herself was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
7. Use of examples and illustrations was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
8. Ability to answer questions in class was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
9. Availability out of class (e.g., office hours) was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
10. Selection of course materials (e.g., textbook) for the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
11. Use of course materials (e.g., textbook, appropriate tests) was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
12. Compatibility with your learning style was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
13. Demonstrated knowledge of the course's subject matter was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
14. Overall teaching ability was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
Regarding the course:
15. The amount of effort needed to succeed in it was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
16. The intellectual challenge presented by it was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
17. The knowledge from prior courses required by it was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
18. Knowledge of the subject before you took the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
19. Knowledge of the subject after ou took the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
20. Your achievement of the learning objectives for the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
21. Interest in the subject before you took the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9
22. Interest in the subject after you took the course was 5 4 3 2 1 -9

[The Montana Professor 20.1, Fall 2009 <http://mtprof.msun.edu>]


Contents | Home